為什么說潘金蓮不開窗的話，中國將是第一大國,事實如此嗎

，潘金蓮絕對擔(dān)待不起啊。

撒切爾夫人在何時何地說過“將來世界上只有兩個大國

，一個是美國

，一個是中國?div id="d48novz" class="flower left">

！泵菜浦形乃阉骼镎也坏?div id="d48novz" class="flower left">

？

因為撒切爾根本沒有說過后一句話，所以沒有原始的出處

。
用膝蓋想想好了，撒切爾夫人這種政治家，會對中國如此浮夸、如此淺薄地說三道四？她會對歷史這么可憐地?zé)o知？這種話說出來沒有貶低中國，貶低的是她自己和英國人。
第二句話和第一句話完全是矛盾的話，根本是南轅北轍的兩個內(nèi)容，怎么會出自同一人對國際政治的評價？
后面這句話的真正出處，是一小撮骨子里自卑又可憐里的冥運或者輪子，或者是神經(jīng)兮兮的公共識字分子，他們恨中國，厭惡中國，但是自己又不敢以真面目共公開說，所以搞了沒法考證的“出處”，為了增加話的份量，撒切爾就“被”開口了。

第一句話，找了一陣，發(fā)現(xiàn)她也沒有說過，但是有類似的言辭。有兩篇她關(guān)于中國的演說
第一篇是：《中國崛起：史詩般壯麗的20世紀(jì)中國》（Margaret Thatcher 《China Rising: The Epic History of 20th Century China》）網(wǎng)上有視頻。
另一篇是在美國胡佛學(xué)院的演說《時代的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)》《 the Hoover Institution ("A Time for Leadership")》，這個演說有她的全文。關(guān)于中國她是這樣說的“
China.....
We are apt to say - and I say myself, when I forget - that victory in the Cold War meant the collapse of communism. But, of course, that is not strictly true. Indeed, one communist power has actually benefited by the implosion of the Soviet Union. China is now the main candidate to become a superpower, and its intentions and capabilities are rightly the subject of intense debate.
China is certainly a rising power - its already vast population is growing, so is its economy, and so are its ambitions - all three in contrast to those of Russia. And still more than Russia, China's past history and present ideology suggest that for the foreseeable future it remains deeply hostile to the West.
The argument that economic progress will automatically change that is flawed. It is certainly true that pressures for democracy will increase as living standards rise. But the ruling elite in China, which uses the slogans, apparatus and methods of communism to stay in power, is not going to go quickly or quietly. It cannot afford to embrace democracy, and at the moment it does not need to. It is, after all, able to repress dissent without much difficulty. It has even perfected a system, combining enterprise, corruption and slave labour, that allows it to benefit from growing prosperity. And I would like here to pay tribute to Harry Wu who courageously exposed that wicked system.
Communism with "Chinese characteristics" still has many of the characteristics of communism. Yet for all its abuses, China should not be isolated: it is far too important for that. Indeed, it should be drawn further into the global economy. But nor should it be appeased, particularly over Taiwan.
China will not become a superpower to match the United States - at least, not while it is held back by the dead weight of socialism. But it is a potentially hostile regional power. In the long run, democratic India may emerge as a counterweight. But today and for the foreseeable future, it is Japan which must be America's strategic partner in the region. Keeping that partnership alive and well is the fulcrum of stability in the Far East.

潘金蓮喜歡過武大郎嗎

？

潘金蓮肯定沒有喜歡過武大郎

，她對武大郎或許有感激有愧疚，但從來沒有愛情

。

潘金蓮和武大郎是完全兩個世界的人